#Ш§Щ„Щ†ШµЩЉШЁ Ш§Щ„ЩЉШЇЩ€ЩЉ php 5.2 free

Furthermore, it is imperative to keep in mind that the structure of current institutions is not a result of the regime in power. The issues at stake are far more divisive than immediate gains. This type of change has to be inclusive not exclusive and based on discourse not violence and erratic attempts. A regime change is needed in a manner that is not threatening to integration and unity of national institutions. This condition is threatening the collective belief in the Syrian state capability of existence and survival.

Nothing is far more dangerous than leaving crucial decisions with impact for years to come to angry protestors and ineffective bodies of governance. In reality, the former excluded the active majority from political reform in a way, while the latter refused the whole concept of reform all together leaving no room for discussion and taking the matter to the streets and the masses. The outcome of it was a strange one on one hand the government took the steering wheel and started a fast track process of introducing numerous laws & regulations to convince everyone it was doing its due diligence while the opposition fought back by stripping the government of its right to expedite the process of change. It was evident that occurring changes were much less than expected. Thus, the вЂњSilent MajorityвЂќ was taken aback by the unexplainable uprising in most Syrian cities. This, nevertheless, was meant to improve the outcome of the state not to dismantle it. Even people in the highest echelons of power knew it was coming.

More than ever, the need for change is inevitable. Avant-gardists co-exist with traditionalists in every domain.

#Ш§Щ„Щ†ШµЩЉШЁ Ш§Щ„ЩЉШЇЩ€ЩЉ php 5.2 free

Exposure to free market policies changed economic behavior fundamentally. The Syrian population growth rate is one of the highest in the world. Syria today is very different from the state it was in 1963 when the ruling party took power. This process of change from within was not only triggered by political needs but by economic, cultural and social necessities. This is by no means a gift from the regime but a committed effort from the вЂњSilent MajorityвЂќ. It is important to highlight as well that a serious attempt for change started years ago on all different levels of government to open up the discourse and diagnose the requested modifications to a closed system. Thus, the vague political terms used and consumed by media debates like freedom and change can only be used to describe and specify a general state of thinking without actual detailing of what it entails if put to the test in everyday governance. The danger, nowadays, threatens the solid beliefs of the founding fathers, if I may use this expression, by debating the unspoken truth, highlighting ethnic & religious discrepancies and pushing the interest of one group to the detriment of national interest. Muslims & Christians as well as Arabs & non Arabs all contributed to the construction of a modern state.

Since its early days, the Syrian state did not hide its indifference to religion and all its national figures agreed amongst themselves upon this unspoken truth. An important aspect of the Syrian State was its secular face, rarely exposed and discussed but very evident and present to prudent observers. However, this growing opposition abroad presents another concern as it aims to de-root all aspects of modern governing established in the country since its independence. This, of course, comes as no surprise in a country where true politics disappeared under one party ruling for four decades. Currently, the representation of the Syrian population is reduced to ineffective pro-government speakers and external chaotic opposition mostly represented by ambiguous characters with little substance to offer. Syria today is suffering mainly from the absence of a вЂњsilent majorityвЂќ from its political debates. However, this debate over these principles in Syria overshadowed the systematic destruction of secular state using vague political terms, conflicting regime change with state destruction and applying a divisive discourse that can only lead to separation instead of integration. Since its beginning, the Arab Spring phenomenon dominated the waves of local & international media and focused discussions about the current state of affairs in the Arab world on two major principles freedom & regime change. The Arab Spring & the decay of secular state in Syria